Mastercam v9 posting only g1 moves update#

You could download the MpmasterX3.pst, from the mastercam site, and then compare it to your post to see how it stands. Many users would disable features because they 'seemed' too advanced, or 'not applicable' then, but now better paths are created with a 'newer' posts. The mastercam reseller, is at this stage, your best friend as he would be able to give you a more compatable generic post for your machine that would only need minor adjustments to customize, plus you wil get added features, methods etc. Some postblocks, strings and some addresses used in a V9 post are, most definitely, now obsolete.

Mastercam v9 posting only g1 moves update#

Something's definitely gone wrong in the update process to X3.ДЄny more help?A V9 post may not be the best thing to take into X, let alone X3Дid you fully check out the update log file that gets created for any issues that could not be updated ? 1 for both the line length and arc radius and a 45 deg angle (If I have the room). Use a line length of more than 0 so it has room to move and adjust for comp.

You're actually telling Mastercam to post comp on an arc. The last job I did with it had to be drip fed into the machine it was to big to fit into the internal memory. It's not your post, it's how you're doing the lead in/out. It's doing exactly what it should do and cutting in the way I want it to. If I backplot the toolpath I can see all the rapid moves and stop points.

but then when it rapids to the next start point it also tries to feed to depth, with a new line number. The tool rapids down to the reference height at the start position then feeds to depth, feeds across the job then rapids back to reference, as it should. Here's another one, it's a one way facing operation and I've just noticed something really messed up with it.